Birds & Science
> Hudson
River Valley Conservation >
Birds & Science
Bird Conservation in the Hudson River
Valley
Hudson Valley Habitat Management
Decision Tree (for managing bird habitats): Managing
Habitat for Forest Birds
 |
| Scarlet Tanager © J. Nadler |
Background
Forest habitats dominate the Hudson River Valley and support
more bird species than other habitat types. Importantly, managing
forests for birds is highly compatible with managing forests
for other purposes, including for financial reasons. A clearcut
in the middle of a large, mature forest will create habitat
for birds that require successional (i.e. young, regenerating)
forest habitat as well as yield marketable wood. As a result,
much research has evaluated how birds and other wildlife respond
to forest management and numerous resources are available
to help landowners manage forests in the Hudson River Valley.
Habitat Description
There are many different types of forests in the Hudson River
Valley, including swamp forests, high elevation spruce-fir
forests in the Catskill High Peaks, Pine Barrens, scrub oak
forests on the Shawangunks, and the ubiquitous deciduous and
mixed (i.e. conifers mixed in with deciduous trees) forests
found throughout the Valley. In addition to differences in
tree species composition, forests differ by successional stage
depending on their past disturbance histories, ranging from
early-successional sapling stages to mature forests and everything
in between. Different forest birds are associated with different
successional stages and types of forest, although many will
use a range of both forest type and successional stage. For
most birds, the dominant tree species are less important than
the physical structure, including such characteristics as
the density of ground and shrub-layer vegetation and canopy
closure. Other species have narrower habitat requirements,
needing, for example, some conifer trees in the forest for
it to be appropriate. These management recommendations apply
largely to deciduous and mixed forests in the Valley.
Threats
The most significant threats to forests in the Hudson River
Valley are residential and commercial developments that lead
to more or less permanent conversions of forest to non-forest
uses. Fires, floods, and ice storms might seem like they threaten
forests, but these natural disturbances actually help maintain
a matrix of successional stages across the landscape, providing
habitat for the full diversity of bird species. Development
not only destroys habitat, but it fragments the remaining
habitat making it less suitable for birds.
| Forest Bird Species
considered at-risk in the Hudson River Valley |
| Common Name |
Season found in Hudson Valley* |
Uses Successional Forest Habitats? |
| Ruffed
Grouse |
B,M,W |
Yes |
| Sharp-shinned
Hawk |
B,M,W |
|
| Cooper's
Hawk |
B,M,W |
|
| Northern
Goshawk |
B,M,W |
|
| Red-shouldered
Hawk |
B,M,W |
|
| Broad-winged
Hawk |
B,M |
|
| Black-billed
Cuckoo |
B,M |
Yes |
| Northern
Saw-whet Owl |
B,M,W |
|
| Downy
Woodpecker |
B,M,W |
|
| Northern
Flicker |
B,M,W |
Yes |
| Eastern
Wood-Pewee |
B,M |
Yes |
| Acadian
Flycatcher |
B,M |
|
| Yellow-throated
Vireo |
B,M |
|
| Blue-headed
Vireo |
B,M |
|
| Veery |
B,M |
Yes |
| Bicknell's
Thrush |
B,M |
Yes |
| Wood
Thrush |
B,M |
|
| Northern Parula |
B,M |
|
| Magnolia
Warbler |
B,M |
Yes |
| Black-throated
Blue Warbler |
B,M |
|
| Black-throated
Green Warbler |
B,M |
|
| Blackburnian
Warbler |
B,M |
|
| Bay-breasted Warbler |
M |
|
| Blackpoll
Warbler |
B,M |
Yes |
| Cerulean
Warbler |
B,M |
|
| Black-and-white
Warbler |
B,M |
Yes |
| American Redstart |
B, M |
Yes |
| Prothonatary Warbler |
B,M |
|
| Worm-eating
Warbler |
B,M |
|
| Louisiana
Waterthrush |
B,M |
|
| Kentucky
Warbler |
B,M |
|
| Hooded
Warbler |
B,M |
Yes |
| Canada Warbler |
B,M |
Yes |
| Scarlet
Tanager |
B,M |
|
| White-throated Sparrow |
B,M |
Yes |
| Rose-breasted
Grosbeak |
B,M |
Yes |
| Purple Finch |
B,M,W |
|
| |
|
|
*B-breeding,
M-migration, W-winter |
Management Recommendations
If you haven’t already, please visit our decision
tree to determine if managing for forest makes sense for
your property.
- Think about the landscape and what your property
has to offer
One of the first decisions the landowner will need to make
is what successional stage should the management strive
to achieve. Intensive management that removes a significant
portion of the trees will set the forest back to earlier
stages of succession and provide habitat for species that
use successional forests. Intensive management opens the
canopy, allowing more light to reach the forest floor, which
prompts ground and shrub-layer vegetation growth. Less intensive
or no management will leave a forest that supports birds
that require more mature forests. Moderate intensity management
through various types of partial harvests can allow some
light to penetrate, but still retain a mostly or partially
closed canopy. The decision about how intensively to manage
a specific property should be made with the surrounding
landscape in mind as much as the property to be managed.
For example, if the landscape is predominantly mature forest,
then creating some early-successional forest through logging
will provide habitat for birds that might not be common
in the area. In other situations where mature forests are
lacking, simply doing nothing and allowing your forest to
continue to mature might be the best management decision
for birds. Use the decision tree to help guide your decisions.
- Large forest blocks are better than small forest
fragments
Small patches of forest surrounded by open fields or other
non-forest land uses (i.e. fragmented forests) present big
challenges for breeding forest birds. The edges that are
created allow predators and nest parasites (Brown-headed
Cowbirds, which lay their eggs in other birds’ nests)
easier access to nests, preventing many birds from successfully
fledging young. Large, unfragmented forests help breeding
birds avoid these challenges, resulting in more successful
nesting.
 |
| A regenerating clearcut will provide habitat for
many forest birds in the Hudson River Valley. |
Work with a good forester
There are many different ways to manage forests in the Valley.
As a landowner, the decision about your management objectives
is up to you, but achieving the desired management objectives
is best left to a professional. A professional forester
will know which trees should be removed to leave behind
the kind of forest you are seeking and can oversee the logging
and sale of the wood. Contact the Department of Environmental
Conservation office in New Paltz to get a list of qualified
foresters in your area.
- Beware of too many deer
In many parts of the Hudson River Valley, deer are so abundant
that they are having serious impacts on forest composition,
biodiversity, and regeneration. In some cases, browsing
deer can cause complete regeneration failure following a
cut, with the result that a forest fails to grow back where
the landowner desired. Forest managers must consider this
carefully when planning logging operations in the Valley.
- Follow Best Management Practices
Forestry Best Management Practices (BMPs) are practices
that help protect soil and water resources during the process
of forest management. Following BMPs does not constrain
forest management options, but it allows landowners to pursue
their preferred options while minimizing long-lasting site
disturbance, erosion, and watershed impacts. BMPs guide
such things as road building, stream crossings, and logging
on slopes – all of which influence the impact of the
operation on your property and your neighbors.
Helpful Resources
ConserveOnline
resources for Private Forest Owners provides ideas and
resources to forest landowners, as well as technical information
on using best management practices. Implementing these conservation
measures can even help private forest landowners meet their
financial objectives.
DeGraaf, R. M., M. Yamasaki, W. B. Leak,
A. M. Lester. 2005. Landowner’s Guide to Wildlife
Habitat: Forest Management for the New England Region. Burlington,
VT: University of Vermont Press. 111 pages.
Hartley, M. J., K. L. Sullivan, M. F.
Burger. 2004. Wildlife and Forestry in New York Northern
Hardwoods: A Guide for Forest Owners and Managers. Audubon
New York, Albany, New York. 40 pages. Available here.
Oehler, J. D., D. F. Covell, S. Capel,
and B. Long, eds. 2006. Managing grasslands, shrublands,
and young forest habitats for wildlife: a guide for the
Northeast. New
Hampshire Fish and Game Department.
|